This started as the posting of a neat idea I thought had correct behaviour and only then turned out to be incorrect.

For someone who doesn’t read the follow-up comments and posts it would seem like a good idea to take it without questioning. I’ll add a note at the beginning of the original post to reflect this.

Leslie

> Here?s a quickie for the newbies among you:
> …

From your new post:

> The second mode is exploration and experiments.
> My last two posts on the randomization of
> sequences were just that, and
> collaboratively that.

so also the social part is shuffled ?

> both of these posts were not about presenting
> a well-tested algorithm ready for public
> copy-and-paste, …

… but sufficient for the newbies among us.

> Unfortunately this one is also so straight-forward
> that it hasn?t much potential for intellectual
> stimulation (at least not for me),

This happens also to newbies; get over it !

> Unfortunately some readers seem to have
> misunderstood this.

No, but you are listed on Planet Lisp. This should cause some feeling of responsibility for your chattering.

Xach ! help !